About How to Win Every Argument. This book really wasn't what I expected. The author seasons each example with some dry humor but at times it makes me wonder if he's a douchebag, like when he mentions stupidity as a cause of supporting nuclear disarment. Emphasis in print is usually given by italics, and those who supply them to a quotation from someone else are supposed to say so. It's worth reading for the information but it's not as entertaining as it hopes to be. Some oldies but goodies to always be on the lookout for: apriorism; false binary; motte and bailey; ad lazaram; and, of course, the strawman. The title is total clickbait. Start by marking “How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic” as Want to Read: Error rating book. People will break the law to obtain justice. Staying calm will let you walk away from arguments you don’t need to win, or abandon positions you are clinging to out of pride or habit. Fun book with a little history, a few contexts for argument (Twitter is given, but Medium or Facebook might have been interesting as long-form written social media in contrast to newspapers or magazines - a signpost to Kialo as a very logical and modern forum could have been worthwhile), and the main section is a glossary. Some interesting stuff, but not enough justify slogging through this rather difficult read. This book is much more about how to identify different types of rhetoric than it is about winning an argument and crushing your enemies. I study logic and philosophy, and teach it to homeschool kids, so I thought this might be a book that illustrates these fallacies in an entertaining way. Analytical – You’ll understand the inner workings of the subject matter. It trains you into looking for fallacies often used in arguments, and it also gives tips and tricks on how you might pull such fallacy off with flying colors. Will this book help me out with debating ? Welcome back. Insider’s take – You’ll have the privilege of learning from someone who knows her or his topic inside-out. A lot of different types of logical fallacies were explained, and they were really interesting. I believe this work should be read before any other book - as soon as possible in life. The book is listing of different types of fallacies in Latin with brief explanation. How to Win Every Argument by Madsen Pirie Review. Born in Hull, Pirie is the son of Douglas Pirie and Eva Madsen. Think tanks are paid to churn out damage control options PR and image campaign consulting for. 4 How to Win Every Argument (Actually, we probably read that men are born equal. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published While you want a solid base of logic, most arguments are won by emotion. At getAbstract, we summarize books* that help people understand the world and make it better. Plan to win arguments by clearly defining what the arguments are about, and what you need to do to win them. Just a bunch of fallacies, not the practical application of how to apply them. The author honed his rhetorical skills on the most important arguments of the 20th century (e.g., The Cold War). Argument is not taught well in high school or college courses. Its a nice read, not very interesting. You are taught what to believe, false rhetoric and inherited beliefs from when you are very young. Helpful – You’ll take-away practical advice that will help you get better at what you do. The where parents that felt tedious & repetitive. Pick Your Battles: You Can’t Win Them All. May 1st 2006 Visionary – You’ll get a glimpse of the future and what it might mean for you. The content of the book is good. This book gives a good description of all fallacies concerning logic. The examples are very good and the advice on how to use each fallacy to your advantage quite humurous. Montreal Freethinkers Book Club pick for this September 2013. Innovative – You can expect some truly fresh ideas and insights on brand-new products or trends. I found it in pdf online and thought it sounded interesting. While you want a solid base of logic, most arguments are won by emotion. An introduction to Critical Thinking. I was disappointed in this book. Scientific – You’ll get facts and figures grounded in scientific research. Select the sections that are relevant to you. Fascinating that impacted me much more than any philosophical work. Born equal carries an implication that they do not remain equal for long.) This is the book your friends will wish you hadn't read, a witty and infectious guide to arguing successfully. Once you have read this book you'll find yourself spotting the fallacies all the time when chatting to your friends, watching TV interviews or reading opinion pieces. Tried these with people around and it works sometimes, varies individual to individual on how they use it. The alphabetic organization works in making the fallacies easily accessible, but it does not help in clarifying the relationship between the fallacies which are expressed more in the back, but still not explained. Madsen is no stranger to political rhetoric in popular media; he works for a think tank. Look for the hidden messages behind the words. We rate each piece of content on a scale of 1–10 with regard to these two core criteria. Argument is not taught well in high school or college courses. Anybody can learn these methods, which range from recommendations to stay calm to suggestions on shaping your message according to context. getAbstract recommends this book with a drop of cynical caution: if you are naïve anyway, and must argue, also get some tougher, more wary advice. The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense. This is an excellent book that introduces the multiple logical fallacies that we see in some form or another almost every day. Accent is obviously a verbal fallacy, for the most part. People will die in wars to win it. Conflict is part of any relationship, but being in conflict does not mean you have to get hurt or lose your emotional balance. Working with pure logic in electronics is one thing, but exploring linguistic logic further was entertaining. difference between some of them. How to Win Every Argument book. Interesting Book. How to Win Every Argument by Madsen Pirie, November 2007, Continuum International Publishing Group edition, Paperback in English The book is an A-Z of fallacies people make while putting forward arguments listed by their Latin title. He and his firm negotiate worldwide in many different industries, from music to real estate. See 2 questions about How to Win Every Argument…, Heat Up the Holidays with These 27 Winter Romances. The distinctions between some of the fallacies are not clear. The more I put its lessons to work, the more I re-read "How to Win Arguments," the better I get. Mayer mostly discusses ethical arguments, seeks win-win outcomes and seems to assume that you’ll always be arguing with upright people. It consists of a list of logical fallacies in alphabetical order, which can be admittedly a little dry. Refresh and try again. We look at every kind of content that may matter to our audience: books, but also articles, reports, videos and podcasts. Overview – You’ll get a broad treatment of the subject matter, mentioning all its major aspects. All are useful and presented in clear principles and vivid illustrations. by Continuum Intl Pub Group, How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic. However, getting most opponents to accept these rules would be nearly impossible. Read 2 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. How to Win Every Argument is a tour of 79 logical fallacies.